Government Stimulus Package #2

This is not an efficient stimulus package. Obama and the rest of the democrats have already demonstrated to not know what they are doing with his recent comments saying something like “I don’t understand all these complaints about the spending in the stimulus package. What do you think a stimulus package is?” So he basically admits that he believes stimulus = government spending. Stimulus will cost the Government money, but it should not be in the form of welfare. Most of the spending is welfare one way or the other to specific industries and the problem is that is only a short term fix. The stimulus package should be incentivising people and companies to create jobs and invest. It should be cleaning up the financial issues weighing down companies, banks, and individuals, which would allow them to invest in new ideas, start companies, and buy houses.


There should be no spending on education, defense, and agriculture in a stimulus plan. These are all examples where congress is trying to funnel money to their constituents. These areas might need funding, but not as part of this bill. It should come out of the normal operating budget.


In addition, all stimulus should be effective in 2009, not 2010-2012, as much of it is. Giving everyone tax breaks that amounts up to $800 is another band aid that was tried last year with no long term success. Instead, cut taxes on companies and small businesses. Allow them to depreciate all equipment purchases in 2009. Provide tax relief on purchases of foreclosures and all house purchases, not just for first time home buyers. Develop a comprehensive energy plan that is more than just light bulbs. One idea I’ve heard mentioned is converting the government fleet of vehicles to natural gas. This would include mandating new purchases, and possibly retrofitting current ones. This would benefit car companies and local small businesses, clean up the emissions (60% less emissions), and lessen our dependence of oil. This would also fund infrastructure upgrades and eventually allow consumers to begin transitioning to this technology.

Those are just some ideas, but unfortunately with this many people working on the bill we can never get a efficient stimulus plan. Designing anything by committee just leads to too many compromises and a bloated price tag, as each side will concede on something to get their piece of the pie.

I contend that the stimulus package should not be aimed directly at providing people currently struggling with their bills, whether due to loss of their job or lower incomes. The reason being that the government cannot possibly provide those people with enough money to live on. Just look at how much it will cost to give those making under $70k, $800. Instead it has to be focused at the root causes of the current markets, namely the credit markets and housing, both of which are interconnected. Unfortunately, much of the blame for the problems in each are self-inflicted by the industries and the government. However, if we are to get better, we need to stop the finger pointing and worry about what can be done going forward. The financial market is so interconnected that it is not possible to be vengeful and only help out those companies that are deemed to be innocent in all this. There is also a lot of self-correcting that has to occur. The fact is that the previous strength of the economy was propped up by easy lending practices, low rates, and legislation and policies. This created a runaway industry, too much building, too much buying, too much wealth by homeowners, that used their new found equity to fund many other purchases. There is no doubt that if left up to free market forces the housing market will self correct, but the mechanism is painful. One major point of new regulation and stimulus is to prevent these huge swings of boom and bust, since the free market is just too volatile. However, the credit/banking markets can literally collapse if not backstopped by the government. All the efforts so far have been in form of loans or investments by the government and provided this helps, should be repaid. The country’s economy cannot survive without a viable banking system. If there is no reasonable credit available, there is no business or industry that can operate and be as prosperous as we have been over the last 50+ years. Small businesses need lines of credit to make payroll. All businesses use loans for major investments in equipment, other companies, and growth. This industry is so critical to our way of life that it needs to be the top priority and revived first and the rest will follow.

Please, no Auto Bailout

The Democrats made a clean sweep in elections and control the House, Senate, and Presidency. Now there are no checks and balances on what legislation they can pass. Already, there is talk of giving a way another stimulus package, bailing out the American auto manufacturers, and confiscating 401k accounts for a Government run pension-like program.

Now my worst fears of a socialist country are coming true. Clearly Obama won the election mostly due to the hate of the Bush administration, rather than his plans for the future. We know the Democrat elites have a love for Europe, but let's not turn this country into another France, where the Government protects everyone's jobs and ends up stifling innovation and economic growth. Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid are calling for a loan package be issued to GM, Ford, and Chrysler to keep them in business. We can't start bailing out every industry. We need to allow them to sink or swim on their own. We have to allow the car companies to fix there own problems, by consolidating, reducing costs, and focusing their products to what the market wants.

Notice how the foreign car makers (who employ thousands of Americans) are having an off year, but are still making a profit. This is because they make a product that people want and can manufacture it at a low enough cost to be competitive. And they don't do this by having low paid workers in Japan or China. Toyata, Nissan, and Honda, have plants in Texas, Mississippi, and Alabama where they make cars for the US market. However, they don't have a history of bad deals and promises with the United Autoworkers (UAW).

The US companies have too many product lines, many that are unprofitable, and too many longterm pension and healthcare costs that are killing their bottomline. I heard Larry Kudlow say today that basically the US auto industry is a healthcare company that makes cars on the side. It may require that Ford, GM, and Chrysler file for bankruptcy, scale down operations, and emerge as a leaner, smaller, but profitable company. Likewise, the UAW may have to negotiate contracts that don't kill their own industry. If the Government bails them out, it will only be a temporary patch, that will re-occur over and over again.

Some may argue that if the banks were bailed out then why not a large industry like the auto industry. First, a strong banking and credit system is needed for any and all businesses to function and has world wide implications. No other industry has this far reaching effects. Second, there are alternatives and profitable car manufacturers, so if some were to disappear, it would not create all to fail, but rather strengthen the other businesses.

The airline industries have been going through a similar problem for years, it has caused consolidation, some to file bankruptcy, and new profitable competition to step up. Loaning money to a company like GM is not going to help them, as their problems are not a temporary shortfall of cash, but rather a fundamental business operations problem that won't go away without major changes to the business.

The College Fund

I recently had a little baby boy and started a college fund for him. My plan of attack is to put as much as possible in there for the next two years, at which time it should be close to being enough for in-state tuition for four years. Then I'll let it sit for the next 10 years invested in index funds. I'll re-evaluate around year 12 if it still is enough for in-state tuition and start making adjustments from there. So my priority of investing at this point is: 1) emergency fund, 2) retirement, 3) college.

Traditionally in the past, people have contributed to their son’s, grandchild’s, or nephew’s future education through Savings Bonds or with cash. We have instead established a 529 Plan account for the purposes of saving for college because it has many distinct advantages over traditional investments.

College Costs
College tuition has always been expensive and continues to rise at a higher rate than general inflation. On average, tuitions in 2007 increased over 6.6% at public institutions, 6.3% at private, and 4.2% at 2-year schools. A survey of the costs of local New Jersey schools, in the table below, shows the current formidable challenge of paying for college. It is unlikely that college tuition inflation rate will decrease in the future years, as there is no incentive for colleges to do so, as more and more people attend universities each year.

Investing for College
To combat the college inflation rate, a more aggressive approach is needed than simply socking away money for 18 years in a savings account or using low-yielding EE bonds. To at least keep up with inflation, a college fund needs to average a greater that 6% return. That can only be done by having exposures to equities, which although more volatile than savings bonds, have a history of providing an average annual return of over 9% over the last 15 years. Luckily, college for Jack is 18 years away and the long time horizon allows for a more aggressive approach, as time can be used to smooth out the ups and downs of the stock market.

Savings Bonds vs. 529 Plan
People have felt safe buying savings bonds because they are guaranteed to never lose money and have a face value double of the invested principle. However, the current savings bonds are also guaranteed to not keep up with inflation. EE bonds purchased today have an interest rate of 1.4% and a maturity date of 2028. In addition, the interest is not exempt from Federal income tax. On the other hand, the 529 plan allows one to invest in a number of diversified mutual funds, tax free (not tax deferred like 401(k) or IRAs), that can provide a much greater, although more volatile, return. They benefit from the tax free growth, as well as, tax free use when used for college expenses. In addition, the fund holdings can be very conservative in Government bond funds or more aggressive in all equities, such as a small cap fund, and shifted over time from aggressive to conservative funds very simply online. These are the primary reasons we chose to open a 529 Plan, which are offered separately by every state.

Our 529 Plan
New Jersey’s 529 Plan does not provide any significant incentives for residents, so we chose our plan based on finding the one with the lowest fees and best fund options. We opened with the state of the Nevada, which is administered by Vanguard, who is known for having low cost index funds in a large number of areas. They offer a total of 22 funds in many areas in the Nevada plan. The stock market has been very volatile the past few years, with small gains seen last year and significant losses this year. This coincidentally provides a good time to start our college fund, and since it has an eighteen year horizon, we can utilize the equity funds to provide a higher return. Jack’s College fund was established with an asset allocation as follows:

• Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund – This mirrors the complete US stock market including the large, small, and mid caps and provides the core holdings for the college fund. The US total stock market has seen about a 11% drop this year (as measured by the Wilshire 5000), but we expect the broad stock market to recover and provide respectable results over the next eighteen years around its historical average of 6-8%
• Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund – This is a fund of funds that includes three international funds, the European Stock Index Fund, Pacific Stock Index Fund, and Emerging Markets Stock Index Fund and provides a very diversified international weighting. Much of the growth is expected to come in the emerging and Asian markets over the next few years and provides a good uncorrelated return to the US stock market.
• Vanguard Small Cap Index Fund - This index fund follows the small cap market and provides a heavier weighting of the faster growing small cap segment of the US stock market. This boosts the small cap representation already present in the Total Stock Market Index Fund.
• Vanguard Value Index Fund – This index fund follows value stocks in the US stock market, which includes those stocks whose are considered undervalued and have great potential for growth. Including this fund provides a small additional weighting to value stock.

Our asset allocation for 2008 is shown in the table below:

No bond funds were used in the allocation for two reasons. First, with eighteen years until funds will likely start to be drawn, there is no need to be conservative now, especially as college cost are increasing at over 6% and Treasury rates are low at 3%. Second, interest rates are expected to rise over the next few years in response to the low rates we have now, and expected increase in inflation. If interest rates do go up, it would follow that bond funds will see a drop in net asset value as their yields increase. If and when that happens it may be appropriate to buy into those funds to capture some of the increase yield.